|
Post by carrillo664 on Mar 19, 2015 4:16:03 GMT
Test #4
Alejandro Carrillo
Philosophy 5
M/W 8-925am
Question 1:
i think a large number of people resist the theory of evolution because they might not be knowledgeable enough to determine right from wrong. the idea about darwins theory that makes me feel uncomfortable is that i dont believe we evolutionised from apes. my reason for that is because apes look completely different from humans and i also think if we evolutionized from them they should no longer be here since they matured into humans, or at least they should be able to learn language.
Question 2:
i think the thing that cannot be explained by evolution is why the sky is blue, or why it rains or why the stars shine. it is useless in explaining why magnets have poles and how electrical charges behave.
Question 3:
the three examples of eliminitive materialism would be that the concepts of behavior and experience. other versions are the mental state such as pain, and visual perception. the definitions of the word love and pain are very diverse in ones vocabulary. in one person mind it can mean something completely different than the other persons. hate is just the same, to better define a word it shall be used on a scale of numbers to clarify its true meaning.
|
|
|
Post by melissasalazar on Mar 21, 2015 21:25:06 GMT
March 18, 2015 Code: 22-2
1. The people that resist the theory of evolution do so because they are afraid that everything that they grew up knowing and believing is a lie. Therefore, people deny rather than having an open mind because it might be easier to believe in what you already know. Darwin’s Theory makes me feel a little uncomfortable because my mind wants to reject every part of the information. I am trying to understand and open my mind to it. At the moment, I cannot think of anything that makes me feel comfortable about this theory.
2. I think that the injustice in the world cannot be explained by evolution. Some might want to try and explain it by survival of the fittest. If so, can there be countries that are not fit enough to survive that their whole population has to suffer?
3. Before we thought that the world was flat. Then, when scientific studies showed that it was round people believed what was told to them once again. When I was younger my mom would tell my sister and I that we had to go to the dentist because we were not behaving, but in reality we had to go to the dentist because we needed to get our cavities filled. Like when little kids are told about Santa Clause, they believe that he brings them their gifts. However, when the kids accidentally see their own parents put the gifts under the tree, or a kid in class tells them that Santa Clause is not real. As a kid you make your own conclusions, and by that you believe different things. As adults we do the same, but it is not with whether we believe in Santa.
|
|
|
Post by Perrywinkle on Mar 22, 2015 1:47:12 GMT
22-2
Question 1: This question asks why so many people resist the theory of natural selection. I think it's fairly simple. Many of us are socialized to believe certain things, and there are a great many certain things that can cause resistance from such a theory. There are obviously the strictly religious people. That's too obvious. Less obvious is the way we're just naturally brought up to believe humanity to be some superior being. We lock up other animals in zoos and aquariums and ogle them for money. We keep some animals as pets, and there is a great trend in the world of seeing certain furry animals as "cute." From that, it's really no wonder to me why some of us may regard ourselves as superior or in no way related to apes. We're practically brought up in a world where animals are our toys. Seriously, no wonder nobody gives a crap about them. And most people who do merely pity them. Nothing about Darwin's theory makes me uncomfortable. It's scientific and supported by a ton of empirical evidence. Why would it make me uncomfortable or comfortable? It simply IS, because it works.
Question 2: I'll give some obvious answers just to be safe. I feel like string theory probably can't be explained by evolution. Yeah, that sounds about right. Maybe quantum mechanics too. You know, that thing nobody understands in the first place. Most things physics probably works as an answer to this question.
Question 3: This theory is just the best thing ever. Reducible science is definitely the best kind of science. After all, science is supposed to be a natural explanation for the system that rules us and so should be well interconnected. On to the question, which asks for three examples. I never believed in astrology, but I would always read about it since it used to be rather interesting to me. Now, in terms of eliminative materialism, it is obvious that astrology has no place in the goal of uncovering the processes of the natural world. It has no basis in any other sort of science, nor is it the basis for any other sort of science. Neither does folk psychology or religion. These three things among other theories cannot be used to explain how the world works. It might feel good to "believe" in them, but they occupy a separate region from the natural sciences.
|
|
henry
New Member
Posts: 9
|
Post by henry on Mar 22, 2015 16:36:02 GMT
Film Test #4 22-2 Philosophy 5 M/W 8-9:25AM Henry Han
1. I think the reason why a large number of people resist the theory of evolution is because they do not want to believe that we were created by organisms and evolved throughout time and instead chose to believe in a higher being that would comfort them in their time of need. I think Darwin's theory just makes me curious of how we inherited the traits of organisms to help us evolve. It allows us to improve on what we lack and as scientists say that they were still billions of things that we do not know about our universe.
2. I think evolution cannot explain why the sky is blue. Why the sky is blue is because of molecules in the air which scatter the blue light from the sun than red.
3. People think that being young means that you're healthy and when you're old it means you're unhealthy. It could easily be the other way around but people constantly believe that young people cannot be unhealthy because they're so young and immune to everything and that old people are unhealthy while you see some old people that are healthier than younger people. When I was little I used to love chocolate because it tasted so good but to others it tasted disgusting so what was it really like to taste the chocolate made me wonder and I now know it was only cause of my own senses that I tasted it. Lastly, the color red is seen differently by a bunch of other people, it could be completely different from what we perceived and believed to be red. Red is only a wave that we process as red through our brain but what do blind people define as red or color blind people.
|
|
|
Post by jesspark on Mar 22, 2015 20:28:52 GMT
Jessica Park
Prof. Lane
PHIL 5
21 March 2015
Week 4 Film Test 22-2
Question 1
I think people resist Darwin’s theory because of two reasons; One, it goes against Christianity, one of the most popular religions in the world, and two, it degrades humans. The Darwin’s theory of evolution contradicts the bible about humans being made from god. For Christians this may be difficult because if Darwin’s theory of evolution is true, it means there was no “God” involved with humans being, thus canceling the idea of god’s existence. For people other than Christians, the theory proves our ancestors are fishes and apes are our cousins. Majority of people think humans are better than other species so the idea of being derived from other animals make humans equal to other species.
In my opinion, the theory of evolution explains many aspects of humans. It explains to me why apes behave like humans and why humans have similar body properties as mammals. The theory explains why can perform animal experiments for humans and where did humans come from. However, I do not think humans could have been where we are by ourselves. For fishes to settle on land took trillions of years. Comparing to other species, humans have evolved very fast given our time. I think humans have gotten a special help on that aspect. Was it god? I do not know but it gives a certain unsettling feeling to me.
Question 2
Aristotle once said humans are the only rational animals. However what influenced humans to have rationalism? I think that cannot be explained by Darwin’s theory. Other animals do not have the properties to think rationally. If that was the case, how did humans develop rationalism? Was it just another mutated cell that caused us to think this way? Or is there something more to humans?
Question 3
When I was young, I believed in many things my parents told me. For example, when I asked about my shadow, they told me it is a fairy that follows me around everywhere and I should not do anything bad because that fairy is watching me. They also told me that Santa Clause was real, saying if I am a naughty child, I would get a sack of coal from him. I did not want to get a sack of coal so I did my best to be a good kid. After I grew out of that I learned in school that people believed the sun revolved around the earth rather than the earth revolving around the sun. It is eye opening to know what people believed when they did not know about the truth.
|
|
|
Post by Victor Tjie on Mar 22, 2015 20:30:59 GMT
1.I think people resist the theory of evolution by natural selection because even evolution cannot fully explain where we came from.. They may say we share a common ancestor but where did the common ancestor come from? Science does not want to pull what I call a "religion maneuver" and simply state "it just existed" because it would be hypocritical to the entire existence of science. Regarding Darwin's theory, there's only one thing I don't like about it and that is that it cannot prove how the universe truly came into being.
2. Evolution cannot truly explain where and how the universe came into being. They can only go as far as to saying the Big Bang happened but even that theory has its flaws. Using science itself everything must come from something so where did all the components to the Big Bang come from? Where did the gravity to condense everything into an infinitesimally small point come from? Where did the particles that were condensed come from? It's no different than religion saying we all came from a single God over the span of 6 days and not having any real documented proof of it but at least religion goes out and says we came from nothing.
3.Three examples on Eliminative Materialism are: 1.People used to believe the ocean, waves, and currents were controlled by Poseidon or other gods of water up until the world learned about the constantly moving Earth and how the Moon's gravity actually effects the waves. 2. There was that period of time where Europe and Colonial America believed witches and sorcery truly existed and many people died for nothing because everyone living during that time was too religious for their own good and justified killing by accusation instead of looking for actual proof. The proof itself for half of the reasons people got killed for were explainable by simple science but that didn't exist back then. 3. People today still throw their blame for fortunes or misfortunes to a higher level such as God. They thank God if something goes right or they blame God if something goes very wrong. God is truly not at fault for any of this because everything that happens is more or less due to our own faults. For example: Car accident -> "God wanted this to happen"; no it was either your own fault that it happened because you weren't being careful enough or the other person in the accident wasn't being careful enough.
|
|
|
Post by sandrakta on Mar 23, 2015 2:27:00 GMT
Question 1: I don’t know why a large number of people resist the theory, but I resist it because it’s not explained all the way. A way that I would understand at least I need like a long thorough explanation. Something that makes me uncomfortable about Darwin’s theory is man from animal. I find it weird having descent from an animal.
Question 2: I think everything regarding evolution cannot be explained. I think that because we don’t know how all of that happened. Someone can say something like having descent from an animal but if they don’t have actual proof how do we actually know that. I feel like this theory has its flaws and with those flaws people like me won’t have a hard time with believing it. And explaining it will be hard because the person who made this theory has passed away.
Question 3: Three examples of eliminative materialism if I was ever feeling a certain way I would do something to fix it like if I were thirsty I’d get something to drink, hungry I’d get something to eat. When I go out if the weather is a certain way I’d wear something to fit the weather or if it were to rain I’d get an umbrella to not get wet. These things motivate my behavior to do something like if my mom were to tell me when I was younger that my behavior affected me getting like a toy or something that I wanted it would motivate me to be on my best behavior.
|
|
|
Post by cdgalbraith95 on Mar 23, 2015 2:55:58 GMT
Week 4 Film Responses (Test #22-2) Question 1: I think that a large number of people reject the theory of evolution by natural selection because they are too scared to comprehend what science has allowed us to learn. They become frightened by these unfamiliar and foreign ideals so they use their faith as a sort of scapegoat or defense mechanism. I feel like I’ve always been pretty comfortable with Darwin’s theories and I think that that is because it is what I’ve been taught my whole life in education and although I’ve heard many other ideas of how the universe and the human race came to be, Darwin’s theory of evolution seems to be the most plausible. Question: 2 I think that this is a hard question because theoretically there could be many things that evolution can’t explain. There are some things that I’ve always wondered about their origin and maybe evolution would be able to explain them but it hasn’t yet so we still remain without answers. For example, how did we get life from nothing but non-living material? I’ve heard many theories, such as that of the creation of kinds and evolution occurring from there on out, but I still have no idea where we or any other living thing came from originally. Question: 3 One example of eliminative materialism would be the replacement of the idea that demons and ghouls are what are living inside your body causing you to get sick, with the knowledge of bacterial and viral microorganisms that actually cause our illnesses. Another example would be how we no longer believe that the sun is a god whom we need to worship to survive, when we actually know now that it is the largest celestial being in our solar system that provides our planet with the light energy needed to live. Lastly, we know now that if someone is capable of things that we deem as unfamiliar or unnatural then we become curious and intrigued, rather then calling them a witch and burning them at the stake. sites.google.com/a/student.mtsac.edu/tsunamithoughts/?pli=1
|
|
|
Post by dhgmustang on Mar 23, 2015 3:12:56 GMT
Film Week 4 Code 22-2 1. I feel people resist the theory of evolution because they are to hard headed to open their mind. Some people grew up believing God created them so to say we came from animals would be totally against their believes. People also wouldn’t see stuff as an act of God. For example if we came from animals, the person who should’ve died in the car crash but had a “angel” watching over them wouldn’t be the case anymore. I feel for some of those reasons people reject natural selection. There would be no hope or a nice place to look forward to once we pass away. I would say I feel comfortable with the natural selection theory and it makes me want to look more in depth. 2. I don’t feel evolution can truly explain how the world formed and how as humans’ we were created. Unless we were there when it happened I don’t think we can truly ever say. You have to experience it first hand to know the truth at least in my opinion. 3. Examples would be when people use to think that lighting would happen because the Gods were angry and then we later figured out that it has nothing to do with the Gods. We learned it had to do with the weather system. Another example would be being told Santa was real and if I didn’t do my chores and behave I would get a lump of coal in my stocking. My last example is growing up I remember Pluto being a planet and learning about it and then one day I hear it isn’t, I just didn’t get it. These all are examples of eliminative materialism. sites.google.com/site/ryansworkhistory/
|
|
|
Post by bambino on Mar 23, 2015 3:13:34 GMT
Film Test #4 Code: 22-2 1. I believe one of the biggest reasons people reject the theory of evolution is because they’ve been taught to believe a certain way and that particular way is the best way. Growing up in a Christian household there were many times where I questioned the existence of God. From a very young age I have felt that the bible was just some book that was written to keep people in line, I never really thought much more of that, and dreaded every church held event. Till this day my views haven’t changed much, I’ve said this before and ill state it again, I’m not doubting the existence of God, but I have a feeling it’s much more different than what we as people perceive. But, people still believe because it’s simple to believe, whereas, the theory of evolution makes one think and people tend not to like to do that most of the time 2. I don’t think the conscious can be explained, how is that we are able to have such deep meaningful thoughts, surely evolution did not come up with that, so who did? How is that we are all here on this planet living so functionally, must be the aliens, I swear. 3. I remember when I was younger, I went to the beach along with my family, it was a good day all up until I decided to go further out into the ocean, for some reason I thought it was cool that I could no longer touch the bottom of the ocean floor. After being pushed down by a couple of waves, I could no longer get up nor breathe. I remember thinking to myself that I was going to die, for sure, when all of a sudden I was picked up by a woman , I could see her black flowy hair and she brought me back to the ocean floor where my feet could touch again, then another wave came crashing down on me pushing me under and when I rose up to see the women there was no one in site, just my dad in a family in a far distance sitting in the sand, oblivious to know what was happening with me. When I returned to the sand I asked if they saw the women who picked me up, they said no. I have no idea if that was something that was for real, an angel, or even God. But till this day it still gives me chills. A couple years ago my father passed away from complications from a stroke, and I vividly remember how I felt the day of his passing, in my heart I just knew something wasn’t right and I had went to see him in his hospital room, when I got there he was sleeping, and I had this overwhelming feeling of needing to get out, almost as if someone was pushing me out of the room, I ended up leaving unable to gather myself and couldn’t understand the feelings I was having about not wanting to be in there. I had went home that night and had the worst headache of my life, that didn’t end up going away until about 2 am, when 2 am came I got the phone call from the hospital altering me of my father’s passing. I would like to think that in some realm my father was trying to communicate something to me, and that it wasn’t good, but then again I could be just searching for a connection. Either way, it was completely bizarre. When I was younger I used to love to play with Ouija boards and try to communicate with the dead, yeah, I was a weird one. I have some intimidating stories that are unexplained and I think that the Ouija board definitely was the culprit of such madness, something that not even evolution could explain. sites.google.com/site/birdhaus00/
|
|
|
Post by saifnisar on Mar 23, 2015 3:22:15 GMT
Philosophy 5 Professor David Lane 20 March 2015 Code 22-2
Film Test 4
Question 1) Many people resist the theory of evolution because it steps on their religion. I believe that everything in this world makes sense and if it doesn’t it is in our human nature to make sense of it. I believe that the theory of evolution is a blue print of how we got here so we can make sense of it. I think people need to fully understand their religion, other religions, and other ideas/theories, before they put them down. The problem with people today is they blindly follow a belief and support it with the little facts that they know about it. Question 2) There are many things that can’t be solved or explained by evolution, for example: Is there a god? How did the first organism come to existence? What is the purpose of life? Why did I come to existence? The theory evolution can’t explain the cycles of earth. It can only theorize how certain organisms survived over others. Question 3) One example of eliminative material would be again my brother telling me that there is a monster in his room when I was a kid. The monster became a belief because it was sensible at the time being, but as time passed on I realized the monster didn’t exist. Another example would be the Salem witch trials, people would falsely accuse anyone they found suspicious of being a witch because they acted weird, but somebody finally came and explained that witches do not exist. One more example would be the movie Inception. In the movie Inception, a person would dream and be tricked into thinking it was real. But at the end they would wake up and come to a realization that it was all just a dream and none of it was reality.
|
|
|
Post by pguirguis3 on Mar 23, 2015 3:58:55 GMT
1. In my opinion, people resist Darwin’s theory of evolution and Natural Selection due to their religious beliefs. They have their own opinions on if evolution is even a legitimate theory. What makes me uncomfortable about the theory Darwin thought of, was that there is a chance through natural selection, that some of us might not be fit enough or have the right traits to survive/reproduce in this world. It makes me uncomfortable that I could be that person, and not be able to adapt to the environment or situation that I was put into.
2.One thing i believe that cannot be explained by evolution, is the evolution of morality.
3.Eliminative materialism goes as so, peoples common sense understanding of the mind is false. Which makes absolutely 0 type of sense to me, but I looked up some examples of it, and they go as so. One example in my life is when I am thirsty, i will usually go drink water to quench my thirst. Another example is when it is raining outside, I would go to an area where it is dry, or grab an umbrella. The third example is when I will play basketball or go out for a run, and I feel very sweaty and dirty, I will go take a shower to make myself more clean.
|
|
|
Post by johnnylovesjune on Mar 23, 2015 4:26:14 GMT
|
|
|
Post by lindareyna17 on Mar 23, 2015 4:26:51 GMT
22-2
1.) I think a lot of people resist the theory of evolution because it might go against their religion. Most religious people do not feel comfortable with the answers to their questions being solved by science. They rely on their faith to be the answer to everything, so when they are being told about the theory of evolution, it goes against what they firmly believed in and my feel as if they are going against their religion if they believe another explanation.
2.) Most of the religious views cannot be explained scientifically by evolution because each religion claims to have the right answer. Although in science, there isn’t any cultural boundaries. There isn’t an Italian physics or American physics, its just physics all around the world, the universal language of math and science that everybody can share and come to agreement on when ignoring religion. Unfortunately, It is impossible for our world to forget about religion, even for just a day. Religion and science are two things that just do not mix well, strictly religious people answer all of their answers with “Well God did it” while a person with knowledge of science will provide you with a detailed explanation into how things are formed. Religion just can not be solved by evolution.
3.) With Eliminative Materialism we are able to solve things rationally by mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology , psychology and even sociology. We have evolved from believing things happen because of mythological beliefs. For example, blaming Zeus for causing a thunderstorm. We have also grown up from thinking that babies come from the stork and are delivered to our front door. We have eliminated the idea of spirits causing illnesses and diseases and have come to conclude with a more physiological explanation.
|
|
|
Post by tjhartwig on Mar 23, 2015 4:47:47 GMT
Week 4 Film Questions 22-2 Question 1 I think many people resist this theory because they choose to believe in a creator. One can accept this theory to a certain degree and still have faith in a divine creator. Darwin’s theory is incredibly intelligent and a great leap forward in science. However, his theory that people evolved from apes and that there is no need for a God makes people uncomfortable because he is denouncing God along with any possible spiritual realm. His two theories: Micro-evolution and Macro-evolution vary greatly. I agree completely with Darwin’s Micro-evolution theory and respect him for his discovery. I do not, however, accept Darwin’s theory of Macro-evolution that humans evolved from apes and apes from nothing theoretically. Question 2 I think there are many roadblocks in the theory of evolution that require a great amount of faith. It requires a certain amount of faith similar to the faith many have in their God. A few “roadblocks” that I can point out presently include that of the gap between humans and apes in fossil studies and also on basic intellectual and emotional levels. The second theory that is impossible without faith is the theory of how anything itself was created from nothing. How can something come from nothing? Was the chicken or the egg first? These questions are still unanswered by science and never will be. It is similar to the impossibilities when predicting the location of an electron. These theories, just like the belief in a God, require great faith! Question 3 I will entertain the idea of eliminative materialism for the sake of this test and class but I do not support it. One may argue that a creator is not needed when they discover the scientific process of how things work. For example, the way our bodies fight disease can be explained scientifically or perhaps because the way an instrument can make different noises has a scientific explanation. Some may argue that the way a fire is started is solely scientific. I agree with the explanation for all these examples that I have given, however, I also believe that they are an even greater testimony to God’s creation. How else can one explain the absolutely perfect and cohesive way our bodies work? Sounds and music that instruments create have such an incredible effect on humans that is still under investigation. Fire is an incredible element that has enables survival all throughout history. Just because these things can be explained without reference to a God does not mean there is no God. In the bible, it is stated that humans have free will and will not be forced to accept God. This is still very evident today and helps support my argument. By explaining things scientifically we have the option to exclude God. This does not mean we have to or that we should do so. sites.google.com/site/tuckerhartwig/
|
|